T O P I C R E V I E W |
MagicPatty | A post for reference: http://www.ebay.com/itm/MTG-Thoughtseize-ALTERED-ART-FOIL-/150759142594?_trksid=p4340.m444&_trkparms=algo%3DPI.WATCH%252BCRX%26its%3DC%252BS%26itu%3DUCC%252BSI%252BUA%252BLM%252BLA %26otn%3D15%26po%3D%26ps%3D63%26clkid%3D6354092660274690090 They keep stating that these are done on real cards, and that alters are legal, but they don't state whether their cards are the actual card, as in tournament legal. Is this actually allowed? Are these things legal? How is it done? |
MAB_Rapper | I believe that as long as the card name, mana cost, and text are shown, it's legal. __________________ MOTL's Most Likely to Play in the Pro Tour - 2007, 2008, and 2009 (My 2008 Nationals) The Official Tower Magic Facebook Page
|
airwalk | It's up to the judge to decide. |
Tha Gunslinga | It depends if it's an altered Thoughtseize or if it's just printed on some random card. Kind of hard to tell from the description unless I'm missing something. __________________ Looking for misprinted Commander decks. Got one? Talk to me.
|
MagicPatty | quote: Originally posted by Tha Gunslinga: It depends if it's an altered Thoughtseize or if it's just printed on some random card. Kind of hard to tell from the description unless I'm missing something.
Exactly! - no where does it say that this Thoughtseize is a Thougtseize and not a Swamp... |
Numotflame96 | The whole thing seems odd to me, however if you watch the video, it seems like who ever is selling these is going through a lot of effort to make sure that the cards are playable, and it soundsas though he is also making sure to go through the proper process to avoid copyright infringement. I'm still not entirely sure if having stuff printed on cards falls under the artistic modifications allowed on a card. The only real way to know would be to ask on the mother-site. I have a feeling people would call these out a lot in tournaments claiming they are fakes just because there are so many fakes floating around that look generally similar.
[Edited 1 times, lastly by Numotflame96 on February 15, 2012] |
AGO | If you have to ask if it's real then it most likley is not real. |
dwiz | No returns and some poor feedback. I wouldn't, but Megan Fox, I would. |
Zakman86 | I wouldn't allow them. |
daner | The Dual Lands flowing picture looks amazing. Too bad the price is outrageous for cards you probably wouldn't be able to use in a sanctioned event. |
ScottyStyles | I wouldn't allow it, either. The rules state that the original art must be visible and easily recognized.
[Edited 1 times, lastly by ScottyStyles on February 15, 2012] |
Pringlesman | quote: Originally posted by ScottyStyles: I wouldn't allow it, either. The rules state that the original art must be visible and easily recognized.
No it doesn't. quote: =comprehensive rules Artistic modifications are acceptable in sanctioned tournaments, provided that the modifications do not make the card unrecognizable, contain substantial strategic advice, or contain offensive images. Artistic modifications also may not obstruct or change the mana cost or name of the card.
It says makes the card unrecognizeable. Not the card's art. There are other ways of a card being recognizable besides the art. |
caquaa | I wouldn't allow them as a judge at anything beyond a FNM. If they are thicker or weight more, even ever so slightly, you can tell the difference if you've played this game long enough. For FNM or such, as long as I felt the card was a real card and a foil layer applied, I wouldn't have a problem with it. GP, PTQ, etc, then we'd have an issue. |
Zakman86 | quote: Originally posted by caquaa: I wouldn't allow them as a judge at anything beyond a FNM. If they are thicker or weight more, even ever so slightly, you can tell the difference if you've played this game long enough. For FNM or such, as long as I felt the card was a real card and a foil layer applied, I wouldn't have a problem with it. GP, PTQ, etc, then we'd have an issue.
The problem isn't that they're altered, the problem is that you can't tell if it's a real card. |
Meddling Pimp | I wouldn't allow them in any of my events, even if they are real Thoughtseizes. |
MagicPatty | So I'm sure several of us know of acetoning a foil cards face off, then printing on a transparency, then spray glue to create a proxy foil. These are much heavier, thicker, and are quite easy to detect. They still look cool, but aren't of this quality. How are they doing this? |
Jazaray | quote: Originally posted by Pringlesman: [B] =comprehensive rules Artistic modifications are acceptable in sanctioned tournaments, provided that the modifications do not make the card unrecognizable, contain substantial strategic advice, or contain offensive images. Artistic modifications also may not obstruct or change the mana cost or name of the card.
However, it DOES state that the card may not obstruct the mana cost or name of the card, which most of their cards do, so no, they are not tournament legal. Thanks, Jazaray
__________________ A Plastered Dragon Original Limerick: There was a nice lassie named Jaz Many wished to have what she has, A delicate face, A soft warm embrace, And a whole lot of bedroom pizzazz.WeedIan: Jazaray is like MOTL's Mom. Jaz is now selling Tupperware! Help her out! ;)
|
Demilio | These are the ugliest things I've ever seen. I can't believe how much people are spending on these. The $100+ that people have spent on the dual lands from this guy is just insane. |
MagicPatty | quote: Originally posted by Demilio: These are the ugliest things I've ever seen. I can't believe how much people are spending on these. The $100+ that people have spent on the dual lands from this guy is just insane.
hence... how are they made? |